Friday, January 27, 2006

Not-So-Chocolate City?

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/27/national/nationalspecial/27orleans.html?_r=1

I expect these numbers are extreme, but 80% of Black New Orleanians staying away? I'm with the mayor--won't be New Orleans if that happens.

Estimates have been wrong about everything so far--time to drain the city, number of deaths, rate of students returning--pretty much in universally pessimistic directions. I hope this is another case of overwrought concern. Frankly, I can't even imagine New Orleans without an African American majority.

So much has been made of race in the city, but I honestly believe that this is a city with more interracial interaction and acceptance than just about any other. True, wealth is not proportionally distributed, but because Whites are so drastically outnumbered, we tend to have a relatively large number of upwardly mobile Blacks, and Black people in positions of power. True, the "underclass" is almost entirely Black, but this is not a city where White people just go about their business paying no attention to people not like them, at least not in my view. Instead, we go to parades, festivals, and just float around with people very different from us. I love that.

Although New Orleans has had plenty of important White cultural influences, the true culture and soul of the city is Black. My ideal would be that the people who don't love the city would just hit the road, more Black people could leave NO East and come back to the more urban neighborhoods like mine, but I know it's gotten expensive. I keep hoping we can get some kind of "mortgage control" in the form of rent control, but I don't see how that could happen.

One thing that does frustrate me is that there are such differences in activities in some parts of life. Although I did the count of race on my block, and if you go up one side and down the other, it goes like this: BBBWWBWBWBWWBWWB. Pretty cool. And many blocks in NOLA are like that, but at our neighborhood association meeting, the room was packed, but with only about 4 African Americans. Sucks. I expect it's because Black uptowners are more likely to rent than are Whites, which means lest investment in the neighborhood.

So we have to find ways to eliminate the risk of the 80% loss, or it won't be our city again at all. That's the strongest argument yet to abandon the moratorium or to abandon the Lower 9.

Pet Pic o' the Day

TenYear

Well, I just turned in my tenure packet to the administration. This is my 10th year of tenure-track teaching (6 is usually enough), but I had to start over when I switched schools. Didn't mind, because I came here intending to stay for the long haul, and I think I do the job well enough to warrant keeping me around. No guarantees, though, as we've had a tendency to deny tenure (and especially promotion) lately. But I've got to go for it, and I'm reasonably confident. As a mixed blessing, if I get it or not, I can attribute part of that outcome to Katrina (bitch). If I get it, I'll wonder just a bit if they were worried about brain drain. If I don't, though, I can claim that the storm did my job in, as it has so many already.

Probably wouldn't have gotten it done yet (or at least not so nicely) if it hadn't been for E and JR, who essentially kidnapped me to help. See, I'm guilty of something we call the planning fallacy, which is the tendency to anticipate the conclusion of the task, but not the process necessary to get there. That's me. I thought that putting this thing together would be easy because I had my 3rd year review stuff pretty well organized, and knew where the most of the rest of it was. But, as usual, the devil's in the details. We spent about 3 1/2 hours last night all working pretty feverishly, and I still spent another 2-3 hours today polishing and filling in a few gaps. Wonder what I missed. But thanks, E&JR, for killing a night that you didn't have to spare just to make sure I actually had something to submit.

Now I wait. I'll be interviewed sometime in the coming weeks, and I'll probably get the word in April. Promotion notice will come later. I'm tired of waiting, but what are you gonna do?

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Letter to the Editor

I'm not good at getting letters to the editor published. By the time I get around to it, I'm usually too pissed to get my point across clearly and concisely. I expect this one will be no exception, so in case the Times-Picayune doesn't publish me, here's what I wrote today:

In case the people of Louisiana needed any more evidence that the federal administration (which handily won the state in two elections) is Not Our Friend, it was right there on the front page Wednesday. Not only does King George oppose the Baker Bill, our best hope to get our people back, but he refuses to disclose documents relevant to investigations in the catastrophe.

Taken together, these two unfortunately-not-surprising stories tell us that he’s more interesting in covering his own hide than he is protecting ours. The president who lost his veto pen upon taking office has decided to use the greatest natural disaster in US history to play “conservative” in terms of how he helps his subjects—er—citizens. You can bet that he knows that the incriminations in the records are common and profound, so “executive privilege” trumps citizen privilege. How can he get away with this?

I guess having a Democratic governor doesn’t help, but what about that “compassionate” part of his identity that he likes to proclaim? I guess that only counts if Haley Barbour is your governor. The same system that failed to supervise the work of the Army Corps has failed to take politics out of the recovery, and we’re all paying the price.

But as long as Bush still has a few places he can reminisce about his drinking days, he thinks we’re doing just fine. Our city still isn’t itself, we’re missing vital citizens who want to come make a difference, but the man with the cash is too busy tearing up other countries to repair his own. Does he forget that oil comes through here too?

My initial hope after seeing the brutality unfold was that the administration would try to cover up their negligence by throwing so much money at the problem that no one could complain or want to investigate. That doesn’t appear to be happening, his claims of generosity and commitment to the contrary. Instead, we’ve all been shown that voting for Bush is not getting “our man” in office, but is to an insult to everyone in the region.

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Slim


This is slim. He's a wonderful guy and one of my very best friends. He's about 13 1/2 now, and not too long for this world. For the last few months, he's had a urinary tract infection and is on his 3rd round of antibiotics. Yesterday he had an ultrasound to investigate a lump X-rays showed in his gut. We were worried that it might be something serious, and we decided that if it was a simple procedure, we'd get the lump taken out, but if was bad, we wouldn't put him through chemo or anything. He's had a full life and clearly enjoys himself.

Well, turns out the "lump" was food, so obviously we don't need to take it out. Kinda sucks that we spent $220 to find that out, but I'm glad he's ok. If we can take care of this infection, he'll be back on track, although he's slower every month, and he's pretty much deaf now. We'll be watching to see when he stops getting pleasure out of life, and then we will put him to sleep. I'll post a shrine when that time comes. He's seen me through a lot, separation from E while she started her first job, the tornado in Nashville, the move back to NOLA, and now Katrina. He's a champ.

Monday, January 23, 2006

Hi, My President is a Moron

This may be stating the obvious, but Bush obviously cheated off the wrong person when he took Logic.

Why do we have all this emphasis on how necessary the wiretaps are? Isn't the question how legal they are? I'll be the first to admit that I can't be positive they're illegal, but I expect they are because a) they sure sound illegal and b) the administration is emphasizing how necessary they are.

If I was doing something illegal and wanted to get out of it, I too would probably assert how stupid the law is. But it doesn't work that way. If you want to do something illegal, you either get the law changed, or you are breaking the law. When will they see that we all agree that you can probably come up with some good information by spying, but that doesn't justify illegal activity. In a democracy, the ends don't always justify the means.

How does he get away with calling himself a conservative? In fact, he's just the opposite. When is my "small government" administration going to get its act together?